Close Menu
    Facebook LinkedIn
    Geo365
    Facebook LinkedIn
    BESTILL Login ABONNÉR PÅ NYHETSBREV
    • Hjem
    • Anlegg og infrastruktur
    • Aktuelt
    • Bergindustri
    • Dyphavsmineraler
    • Miljø
    • Olje og gass
    • Geofunn
    • Download Media Guide
    Geo365
    You are at:Home » The dark oxygen controversy
    Dyphavsmineraler

    The dark oxygen controversy

    A controversial study claimed that deep-sea polymetallic nodules generate oxygen without sunlight. At Seabed Minerals 2026, an environmental researcher will challenge the finding, pointing to thermodynamic constraints and experimental artefacts.
    By Redaksjonenmars 24, 2026
    Del denne artikkelen Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    Polymetallic nodules in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean. Source: ROV KIEL 6000, GEOMAR

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    In 2024, a study published in Nature Geoscience garnered significant attention from both the scientific community and international media.

    Evidence of dark oxygen production at the abyssal seafloor was published in Nature Geoscience by an international team of researchers led by Dr. Andrew Sweetman at The Scottish Association for Marine Science. Their research was based on several cruises in the Pacific Ocean’s Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ).

    In their research communiqué, the team proposed that polymetallic nodules on the seafloor may create currents strong enough to produce oxygen by splitting water molecules through a process known as electrolysis. The term “dark oxygen” refers to the production of oxygen in an environment where photosynthesis is not possible (the abyssal sea floor is pitch black).

    The process would require a previously unrecognized energy source and could according to the authors have far-reaching implications for ocean chemistry and even theories about life on Earth and other planets.

    However, the claim has remained unreplicated and widely debated.

    At Seabed Minerals 2026 in Bergen (24–26 March), Environmental Scientist Patrick Downes of The Metals Company will present a published critique evaluating the original study.

    The review highlights three main concerns: inconsistency with comparable benthic chamber studies, lack of a viable energy source to drive electrolysis, and evidence from control experiments suggesting the oxygen signal may originate from the measurement system itself rather than from the nodules.

    Multiple independent studies from nodule-bearing regions in the Pacific report only oxygen consumption, consistent with global abyssal averages. In addition, the voltages measured across nodule surfaces fall well below what is required to split water under laboratory conditions. Furthermore, hydrogen, a necessary by-product of electrolysis, was not reported.

    Comparison of seafloor oxygen fluxes measured in situ using benthic chamber landers deployed in polymetallic nodule-rich areas. Illustration courtesy of Patrick Downes (Downes et al., 2025) / conference abstract

    The presentation will examine whether the reported dark oxygen signal reflects a genuine geochemical process or an experimental artefact — a question with significant implications for deep-sea science and seabed mineral research.

    Program and registration details are available on the conference website.

    Related Posts

    Glomar aims to start nodule extraction by 2029

    september 9, 2026

    Seabed Minerals 2027: Call for papers

    august 19, 2026

    Movement towards a mining moratorium

    august 4, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    NYHETSBREV
    Abonner på vårt nyhetsbrev
    geo365.no: ledende leverandør av nyheter og kunnskap som vedrører geofaget og geofaglige problemstillinger relatert til norsk samfunnsliv og næringsliv.
    KONFERANSER

    Vekket interesse for geofag
    Oct 07, 2026

    Vekket interesse for geofag

    Høyere gruvedammer kan gi større katastrofer  
    Oct 05, 2026

    Høyere gruvedammer kan gi større katastrofer  

    Overreaksjon kan utløse istid
    Sep 30, 2026

    Overreaksjon kan utløse istid

    Slik så Norge ut i jura
    Sep 27, 2026

    Slik så Norge ut i jura

    Meteorittkrater: Gardnos
    Sep 23, 2026

    Meteorittkrater: Gardnos

    Up or down – in which direction did the sand go?
    Oct 09, 2026

    Up or down – in which direction did the sand go?

    The Faroese offshore is back on the exploration radar
    Oct 08, 2026

    The Faroese offshore is back on the exploration radar

    Updip advantage in the Rukwa Basin
    Oct 08, 2026

    Updip advantage in the Rukwa Basin

    Chasing mud mounds
    Oct 07, 2026

    Chasing mud mounds

    What else is hiding in your reservoir brine?
    Oct 06, 2026

    What else is hiding in your reservoir brine?

    OLJEPRIS
    BCOUSD quotes by TradingView
    GULLPRIS
    GOLD quotes by TradingView
    KOBBERPRIS
    Track all markets on TradingView
    GeoPublishing AS

    GeoPublishing AS
    Trollkleiva 23
    N-1389 Heggedal

    Publisher & General Manager

    Ingvild Ryggen Carstens
    ingvild@geopublishing.no
    cell: +47 974 69 090

    Editor in Chief

    Ronny Setså
    ronny@geopublishing.no
    +47 901 08 659

    Media Guide

    Download Media Guide

    ABONNEMENT
    NYHETSBREV
    Abonner på vårt nyhetsbrev
    © 2026 GeoPublishing AS - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.